amritsar: DRDO scientist dismisses IED in Rohini court to kill lawyer: Police | India News – Times of India


NEW DELHI: Delhi police special cell arrested a scientist, identified as Bharat Bhushan Kataria, after an exhaustive investigation into the Rohini trial on December 9, Police Commissioner Rakesh Asthana revealed at a press conference on Saturday. The scientist, who is currently being questioned in custody, allegedly wanted to eliminate a lawyer with whom he had a long-standing feud.
YOU was the first to report Saturday that the explosion was not terror-related and had been orchestrated by a DRDO researcher. Kataria started planning the attack a month ago and procured the essentials through e-commerce sites and other means that the police are verifying. He used an anti-theft system intended for bicycles as a remote control to trigger the explosion. He is suspected of having learned the technique online using do-it-yourself videos and web pages, in addition to using his professional expertise.
But the bag that Kataria used to carry explosives, and his suspicious movements captured on CCTV cameras, blew up his cover.
The investigation has revealed that Kataria and the lawyer, Amit Vashisht, lived in the same building until about three years ago. “They have a long-running dispute over 10 years and have filed more than a dozen civil and criminal cases against each other. One such case against Kataria was filed on December 9 in Room 102, Rohini Court, for arguments on charges,” Asthana said.
Kataria, who worked with the Defense Research and Development Organization, reached the court around kl. 9.30 and went into room 102 around kl. 10.15 and searched for Vashisht. He noticed the lawyer sitting in the back row and walking casually in the back. He then placed the bag of IEDs behind Vashisht.
Kataria then went out and triggered the IED from a safe distance with the remote control. At 10.35 he left the court complex from the Ringvejs side and went home in his Ertiga car, the police said with reference to their investigation.
Kataria had managed to prepare a powerful nitrate-based IED. When the circuit was improperly woven, only the detonator exploded, leaving unburned powder and preventing major damage. Only one officer standing nearby was injured and the targeted lawyer escaped unharmed.
“Incriminating material other than the attire of a lawyer used in the incident has been found from the defendant’s residence,” said Asthana, who closely monitored the entire investigation.
The low-intensity explosion was reported around 10.25am. A case under paragraphs on attempted murder (307 IPC) and ยง 3 of the Explosives Act was registered on the special cell.
“Nearly 200 officers consisting of DCP Rajiv Ranjan Singh, ACP By Prakash and others from the northern area began their investigation, while other units in the cell provided input,” said a senior police officer.
Preliminary results from the National Security Guard and forensic laboratory indicated the use of readily available materials for the manufacture of the IED. Components of IED, including chemicals such as nitrate and potassium chlorate and nuts and bolts such as shrapnel, were identified from the waste and an exhaustive effort was made to trace the source of all such components.
The bag used to locate the IED was tracked down to a multinational company manufacturing medical equipment in Mumbai, and then its distributors, including the Delhi-based retailer, were investigated. Stationery stores that sell the kind of file covers found in the bag with the IED were identified. Distributors of the car anti-theft mechanism used in the IED were identified and investigated.
During the investigation, over 1,000 vehicles driving into the court complex on the day of the explosion were verified. Recordings of about 120 CCTV cameras inside and outside the court complex were examined meticulously to identify a suspect.
Voluminous telephone data were analyzed. Based on CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts, several people present in the court complex were identified and verified. Today’s list of lawsuits was also scanned and people related to cases were examined.
A week-long exercise led to the police seizing a dozen suspicious characters. Of them, Bharat Bhushan Kataria became a person of interest. His case was brought up for hearing on the day of the explosion. His counterpart, Amit Vashisht, was sitting in the row next to where the IED exploded.
Vashisht said during the interrogation that he had seen Kataria in court just before the explosion. When police dug deeper, they found out that Kataria was involved.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail

.



Source link

Leave a Comment